Do you suspect that a student has cheated in an exam?

On this site, you can get an overview of the different types of exam cheating. You can also read more about what you should do before you report your suspicions.


What do I do as an examiner if I suspect exam cheating?

If you or your co-examiner suspects that a student has cheated and the student has not yet received a grade for the exam in question, you must first put the exam assessment on hold. Contact studies administration or a person in your department/school secretariat who is responsible for teaching activities – this person can help you with the administrative aspects of suspending exam assessment.

After this, you should thoroughly investigate and document your suspicions before you report the case to Educational Law. Please note that any planned oral defence should be suspended until the case is decided. You can also get help with this from studies administration or the relevant person in your department/school secretariat.

  • Below you can read more about the different types of exam cheating and what you should do before you report your suspicions.
  • You can also go directly to the page on how to report the case.

What should I do as an exam supervisor if I suspect exam cheating?

If you are an exam supervisor and you suspect that a student has cheated in an on-site examination, you must complete a supervisor’s report (tilsynsnote) in which you describe the circumstances. You must also inform the student (in person) that the case will be reported.

Subsequently, you must report the case to Educational Law and inform the local exam administration team. The exam administration team is responsible for putting the assessment of the exam on hold and notifying the relevant parties (e.g. the course coordinator).

  • Below you can read about the different types of exam cheating.

Types of exam cheating

Plagiarism

Plagiarism is a complex concept, but, in the context of an exam, it means that the student neglects to provide sources and thus presents a text, an illustration or idea, etc., as his/her own work when in fact it is not.

The student must provide sources when using any of the following material:

  • All printed material, such as books, articles, websites and other students’ exam papers.
  • All non-print material, such as videos from the internet, TV and radio, podcasts and films.
  • Notes and templates produced in collaboration with fellow students.
  • Material used in class, such as the curriculum or the teacher’s slides or notes.
  • Reuse of the student’s own material, such as previously graded assignments and exam papers.

Plagiarism in any part of the student’s exam paper constitutes exam cheating. It makes no difference to the ruling of the case if the plagiarism occurs in the metadata, the empirical data, the analysis or the conclusion.

However, the following parts of the exam are not subject to plagiarism rules:

  • Titles
  • Common knowledge (depending on the course/subject in question)
  • Table of contents
  • Restatement of exam question(s)
  • Bibliography

More information about missing sources

It counts as exam cheating if the student:

  • Does not indicate direct quotations using quotation marks, indentation or italics (even though the source of the quotation is provided)
  • Translates a quotation but does not indicate it as a direct quotation

More information about incorrect paraphrasing

To paraphrase is to present another author’s text in a different way. The correct way to paraphrase is when the student processes another person’s thoughts and ideas and formulates them using his/her own words and sentence structure.

If the student just rearranges the sentences a bit and replaces a couple of words with synonyms, this constitutes plagiarism. Even if the source is provided.


More information about students reusing their own material / self-plagiarism

If the student reuses parts of his/her own previously graded exam papers from another course, he/she must provide the source. If not, this constitutes exam cheating.

The student may reuse his/her own text from the ordinary exam in the re-examination in the same course without this being regarded as exam cheating. This only applies to exams in the same course.


More information about notes and templates produced in collaboration

If a student refers to notes directly in his/her exam paper and these notes were produced in a group (for example, in a study group), the student should state that they are group notes. If not, this constitutes exam cheating.

If a student refers to templates that were written in a group before the exam, the student must also state that these templates were produced in collaboration with his/her fellow students.


How to document your suspicion

If you suspect plagiarism, you must ensure that your suspicion is documented in your report by indicating every section in the text where you think the student has plagiarised.

If your claim is based on an Ouriginal report, it is important that you do not regard this report as proof that the student has plagiarised. An Ouriginal report only indicates textual similarity and does not determine, for example, whether the student has referenced his/her sources. You must therefore check whether the student has plagiarised and mark the relevant sections in the text. Conversely, it is possible that Ouriginal cannot detect all instances of plagiarism, for example those that relate to translated or paraphrased text. It is therefore important that, as an assessor, you are always vigilant and adopt a critical approach to the text and the Ouriginal report.

You should also find the sources from which the student has plagiarised and indicate the relevant sections in the source material. If you cannot locate the sources, you can get help from the Royal Danish Library/ AU Library.

Once you have documented your suspicions of plagiarism, you should report the case to Educational Law, who will make an overall assessment of the extent of the plagiarism in order to determine the appropriate disciplinary measures.

Collaboration

Students are often encouraged to collaborate as part of their university courses. However, when it comes to the exam, there are other rules that you must be aware of – if the exam requires that students write an individual exam paper, it is considered exam cheating if the student collaborates on this paper.

Collaboration can take many forms, including students sharing notes or exam papers or discussing a take-home exam assignment so that they all reach the same result.

How to document your suspicion

If you suspect that students have collaborated on an individual exam assignment, you must document this by indicating all the places in the students’ exam papers where you think collaboration has taken place.

If possible, please expand on what makes you think the students have collaborated. For example, you may notice the same atypical mistake in two or more exam papers and believe it unlikely that the students would have made this mistake independently. You may also notice linguistic or grammatical mistakes or distinctive features that appear strikingly identical.

If you need to report more than one student for the same instance of suspected collaboration, you can make a joint report using the same template. However, you must state the names and student registration numbers of all the students involved (Read more under “How to complete a report template”). Each student should be notified individually about the report.

Unauthorised contact

During on-site examinations, it counts as exam cheating if the student:

  • Has contact with other examinees or people outside the exam venue – even if the student does not receive help from these people.
  • Sends or receives online communication on his/her PC (for example, an email or a chat message) during an on-site exam – regardless of the content of the communication.

How to document your suspicion

You must complete a supervisor’s report that adequately describes how the unauthorised contact occurred. In cases of exams with online monitoring, you must attach the ITX Flex report. This can be obtained from the exam administration team.

Aiding and abetting

Aiding and abetting is also regarded as exam cheating. During on-site examinations, it counts as cheating if the student completes his/her exam assignment and subsequently shares the assignment with other students, for example through file-sharing systems or storage apps such as Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive or DropBox.

How to document your suspicion

Cases of aiding and abetting are usually reported in the same way as other types of exam cheating, for example plagiarism or collaboration, and must therefore be documented in the same way as in these cases.

If a student is suspected of aiding and abetting during a supervised on-site examination, documentation can consist of a detailed supervisor’s report or an ITX Flex report (if the student has been monitored online).

Falsification or fabrication of data

It counts as cheating if a student falsifies, fabricates, manipulates and/or plagiarises data as part of his/her assignment.

How to document your suspicion

If you suspect that a student has falsified or fabricated data, you must document your suspicion by marking the relevant places in the student’s exam assignment. Please provide as much detail as possible on why you believe the student has falsified or fabricated data.

Exam papers written by others

It counts as cheating if a student gets another person to complete all or parts of his/her exam assignment.

How to document your suspicion

If you suspect that a student has got another person to complete his/her exam assignment, you will need to document this in different ways depending on the specific situation.

For example, if relevant, you can attach a screenshot of the website on which the student has asked for help or offered to pay for exam assistance. You can also indicate all the relevant sections in the exam assignment and explain why you do not believe the student has completed them him- or herself.

Use of tools based on generative artificial intelligence

As a general rule, students are not permitted to use tools based on generative artificial intelligence in their exams at Aarhus University.

Studente may only use tools based on generative artificial intelligence in the following forms of assessment:

  • Bachelor’s projects
  • Master’s theses
  • Final exams on continuing and further education programmes
  • Exams for which it explicitly states in the course description that you may use generative artificial intelligence

If students use tools based on generative artificial intelligence in any of the forms of assessment listed above, they must do the following:

  • Clearly state how they have used the tool. This must be done in an appendix and attached to the exam assignment. They must describe how they have used generative artificial intelligence, including the prompting method. For example, whether they have used it in your preparatory work, to answer questions, to search for information, to give them feedback, to critique their work, or to proofread their text.
  • Provide a reference for any text they use that is not their own – and present this text as a citation. This includes text produced by tools based on generative artificial intelligence. 

Unauthorised exam aids

It is cheating if the student:

  • Has access to exam aids (such as a dictionary, notes, formulas or a mobile phone) during an exam for which no exam aids are permitted – regardless of whether the student uses these aids. For example, if no exam aids are allowed, the student may not have a dictionary on his/her exam desk, even if the student doesn’t use it. 
  • Brings unauthorised exam aids to an exam (for example, another type of calculator or textbook than the permitted type).

Please note: It is not cheating if the student brings an exam aid that remains in a closed bag for the entire duration of the exam. It is only if the student opens this bag during the exam and, by doing so, has access to the exam aid that this is regarded as cheating.

How to document your suspicion

The exam supervisor must complete a supervisor’s report in which he/she describes which unauthorised exam aids the student has brought and – if relevant – used. In cases of exams with online monitoring, you must attach the ITX Flex report. This can be obtained from the exam administration team.

Incorrect attendance information

It counts as exam cheating if a student provides inaccurate attendance information in courses for which attendance is compulsory and thus for which the student’s attendance is considered part of the exam.

This applies to both the student who was not present and the student who provided incorrect information on his/her fellow student’s behalf.

How to document your suspicion

You must provide documentation that the student did not attend teaching even though he/she is listed as being present in the relevant registration system or on the attendance list. This documentation can be a written note from the teacher accompanied by a printout of the registration system or a copy of the attendance list.

Exam assignments submitted from the wrong IP address

For on-site exams, the student must be present at the required location. It counts as cheating if the student is not present but submits his/her exam assignment from an external IP address.

How to document your suspicion

You must provide documentation of the IP address from which the student submitted his/her exam assignment and the attendance list compiled by the exam supervisor, which shows that the student was not present at the exam location. You must also forward the student’s exam assignment.

Exceeding deadlines

It counts as cheating if the student continues to work on his/her exam assignment after the end of the exam. In practice, exam assignments submitted after an exam deadline will automatically be rejected.

Advance knowledge of the exam assignment

If a student has advanced knowledge of an exam assignment and still participates in the exam, this counts as exam cheating – regardless of who is responsible. If AU is deemed responsible, the student will be offered a new examination attempt.

How to document your suspicion

You must provide documentation that the student had prior knowledge of the exam assignment. If a student shared the exam assignment with other students before the exam, this documentation could be a printout from the digital forum on which he/she shared the assignment.