Below is an example of how the results on the different standard evaluation questions will be sent to various stakeholders. Please note that some board of studies has decided that course coordinators not automatically receives reports with information about small group teachers.
In accordance with AU's Quality assurance System, the compulsory follow-up on the course evaluations is divided according to whether the individual courses in the indicator model fall within the intervals:
The indicator is a average grade of responses to the question of overall 7outcome (I rate the overall outcome of the course as), which is used in all evaluations. Local follow-up procedure may vary. The local study and department management team decides on the local follow-up process. In addition, the annual director of studies report in connection with the quality work must provide a brief account of how the course evaluations have been followed up on.